RegistryCompare › Composio vs ToolHive

Composio vs ToolHive

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Composio and ToolHive, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Composio leads on trust — 75.7/100 (Grade B) vs 71.5/100 (Grade B), a 4.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Composiocomposiohq/composio ToolHivestacklok/toolhive
HVTrust score 75.7 71.5
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #205 #293
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #9 #12
GitHub stars 30.2k 2.2k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10 8.4 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 23k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.7 15.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.9 15.6
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 16.6 8.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Partial
Open in the live compare tool → Composio profile ToolHive profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →