Composio vs MCP TypeScript SDK
MCP TypeScript SDK leads on trust: 94.9/100 (Grade A) against 89.5/100 (Grade A), a 5.4-point gap. Composio leads on maintenance and rests on broader evidence; MCP TypeScript SDK leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption. Note: MCP TypeScript SDK's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.
Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.
Choose Composio if maintenance matters most.
- +0.8Maintenance
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
The official TypeScript SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients
Choose MCP TypeScript SDK if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +3.0Adoption: 42.7M weekly downloads against 50.4k
- +0.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 75%
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Composio and MCP TypeScript SDK, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Composiocomposiohq/composio | MCP TypeScript SDKmodelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.5 | 94.9 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #32 | #3 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #5 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 30.8k | 13.7k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.2 / 10 | 6.9 / 10 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 50k/wk | 42.7M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.2 | 21.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.6 | 14.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.2 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.0 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Partial | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →