Composio vs MCP Apps
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Composio and MCP Apps, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
MCP Apps leads on trust — 88.7/100 (Grade A) vs 74.5/100 (Grade B), a 14.2-point gap. Note: MCP Apps's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Composiocomposiohq/composio | MCP Appsmodelcontextprotocol/ext-apps |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 74.5 | 88.7 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #236 | #30 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #8 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 30.3k | 2.9k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | 4d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.5 / 10 | 5.8 / 10 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 42k/wk | 2.8M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 11.3 | 18.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.9 | 13.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 17.6 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.9 | 16.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Partial | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Composio profile
MCP Apps profile
More Protocols & Tool Integration →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →