Composio vs MCP Apps
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Composio and MCP Apps, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Composio leads on trust — 75.7/100 (Grade B) vs 73.4/100 (Grade B), a 2.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Composiocomposiohq/composio | MCP Appsmodelcontextprotocol/ext-apps |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 75.7 | 73.4 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #75 | #87 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #6 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 29.5k | 2.7k |
| Last updated | today | 12d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.9 / 10 | — |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 103k/wk | 1.6M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 13.0 | 12.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.4 | 8.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 13.2 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.4 | 16.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | marketplace |
| Provenance drift | Partial | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Composio profile
MCP Apps profile
More Protocols & Tool Integration →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →