Registry › Compare › Composio vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

Composio vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

Both are Grade A and 0.8 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Composio leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.

A Composio 89.3

Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.

composiohq/composio · #34 overall · #5 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Composio if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.2 against 4.9
+1.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.2 against 4.9
+0.8Adoption: 30.9k GitHub stars against 3.3k
+0.5Maintenance

A FastMCP (TypeScript) 88.5

A TypeScript framework for building MCP servers.

punkpeye/fastmcp · #55 overall · #6 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

FastMCP (TypeScript) doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

20.0

Safety / IntegrityComposio +2.4

17.6

14.6

TransparencyComposio +1.9

12.7

19.9

MaintenanceComposio +0.5

19.4

17.1

AdoptionComposio +0.8

16.3

-0.3

Runtime calibrationFastMCP (TypeScript) +4.8

+4.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Composio and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Composiocomposiohq/composio	FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score	89.3	88.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#34	#55
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#5	#6
GitHub stars	30.9k	3.3k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.2 / 10	4.9 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	56k/wk	727k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.0	17.6
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.6	12.7
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.4
Adoption / 20	17.1	16.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	1 — OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Partial	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Composio profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →