RegistryCompare › Cognee vs OpenViking

Cognee vs OpenViking

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cognee and OpenViking, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OpenViking leads on trust — 87.9/100 (Grade A) vs 83.5/100 (Grade A), a 4.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cogneetopoteretes/cognee OpenVikingvolcengine/OpenViking
HVTrust score 83.5 87.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #61 #24
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #8 #2
GitHub stars 30.4k 35.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 6.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Downloads 25k/wk 80k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.4 20.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.8 13.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.6 17.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 9 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Groq, … 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Firecrawl, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cognee profile OpenViking profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →