Codex vs Qwen Code
Both are Grade A and 0.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Codex leads on adoption; Qwen Code leads on supply-chain integrity and rests on broader evidence. Note: Codex's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.
Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal
Choose Codex if adoption matters most.
- +3.0Adoption: 15.5M weekly downloads against 50.9k
An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.
Choose Qwen Code if supply-chain integrity matters most.
- +4.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 0%
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codex and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Codexopenai/codex | Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.9 | 89.2 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #26 | #34 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #3 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 129.7k | 28.6k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.9 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 15.5M/wk | 51k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 14.9 | 19.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.5 | 13.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 17.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | extensions | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →