RegistryCompare › Codex vs oh-my-pi

Codex vs oh-my-pi

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codex and oh-my-pi, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codex leads on trust — 93.2/100 (Grade A) vs 82.5/100 (Grade A), a 10.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codexopenai/codex oh-my-pican1357/oh-my-pi
HVTrust score 93.2 82.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #3 #52
Rank in Coding Agents #1 #6
GitHub stars 103.9k 21.8k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 4.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 10.9M/wk 84k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.0 16.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.6 12.3
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 17.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 6 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins marketplace
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codex profile oh-my-pi profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →