RegistryCompare › Codex vs Mistral Vibe

Codex vs Mistral Vibe

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codex and Mistral Vibe, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codex leads on trust — 89.7/100 (Grade A) vs 86.9/100 (Grade A), a 2.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codexopenai/codex Mistral Vibemistralai/mistral-vibe
HVTrust score 89.7 86.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #18 #53
Rank in Coding Agents #2 #6
GitHub stars 125.1k 5.0k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 6.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 260k/wk 1.3M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.0 19.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.6 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.2
Adoption / 20 19.5 17.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI 1 — Mistral AI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codex profile Mistral Vibe profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →