Registry › Compare › Codex vs ECC

Codex vs ECC

Both are Grade A and 1.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Codex leads on adoption; ECC leads on supply-chain integrity.

A Codex 89.9

Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal

openai/codex · #28 overall · #3 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Codex if adoption matters most.

  • +1.1Adoption: 28.3M weekly downloads against 21.7k
A ECC 91.0

The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.

affaan-m/ECC · #18 overall · #2 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose ECC if supply-chain integrity matters most.

  • +4.7Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 0%

Where they differ

14.9
Safety / IntegrityECC +4.7
19.6
13.5
TransparencyCodex +0.2
13.3
20.0
MaintenanceCodex +0.1
19.9
20.0
AdoptionCodex +1.1
18.9
+3.5
Runtime calibrationCodex +2.2
+1.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codex and ECC, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Codexopenai/codex ECCaffaan-m/ECC
HVTrust score 89.9 91.0
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #28 #18
Rank in Coding Agents #3 #2
GitHub stars 132.9k 295.7k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 5.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 28.3M/wk 22k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.9 19.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.3
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codex profile ECC profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →