CodeWhale vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code leads on trust: 89.6/100 (Grade A) against 83.3/100 (Grade A), a 6.3-point gap. Qwen Code leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.
Open-source agent for the terminal written in Rust. Use any provider or model. Issues & PRs always welcome
CodeWhale doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.
Choose Qwen Code if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +3.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 22%
- +1.4Adoption: 121.2k weekly downloads against 5.6k
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CodeWhale and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | CodeWhaleHmbown/CodeWhale | Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 83.3 | 89.6 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #114 | #31 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #8 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 41.2k | 28.9k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.9 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 6k/wk | 121k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 16.0 | 19.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.5 | 13.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.1 | 17.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →