Registry › Compare › CodeWhale vs Qwen Code

CodeWhale vs Qwen Code

Qwen Code leads on trust: 89.6/100 (Grade A) against 83.3/100 (Grade A), a 6.3-point gap. Qwen Code leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

A CodeWhale 83.3

Open-source agent for the terminal written in Rust. Use any provider or model. Issues & PRs always welcome

Hmbown/CodeWhale · #114 overall · #8 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

CodeWhale doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Qwen Code 89.6

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

QwenLM/qwen-code · #31 overall · #4 Coding Agents · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Qwen Code if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

  • +3.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 22%
  • +1.4Adoption: 121.2k weekly downloads against 5.6k
  • A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

16.0
Safety / IntegrityQwen Code +3.2
19.2
13.5
TransparencyCodeWhale +0.4
13.1
16.1
AdoptionQwen Code +1.4
17.5
-0.3
Runtime calibrationQwen Code +2.1
+1.8

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CodeWhale and Qwen Code, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal CodeWhaleHmbown/CodeWhale Qwen CodeQwenLM/qwen-code
HVTrust score 83.3 89.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #114 #31
Rank in Coding Agents #8 #4
GitHub stars 41.2k 28.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 5.4 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 6k/wk 121k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.0 19.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.1 17.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers — 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → CodeWhale profile Qwen Code profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →