CodeWhale vs Hermes Agent
Both are Grade A and 0.8 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. CodeWhale leads on supply-chain integrity; Hermes Agent leads on adoption.
Open-source Rust agent engine and terminal client for Codewhale, with provider choice, tools, approvals and receipts.
Choose CodeWhale if supply-chain integrity matters most.
- +0.9Safety / Integrity: 33% of recent commits signed, against 8%
The agent that grows with you
Choose Hermes Agent if adoption matters most.
- +3.9Adoption: 212.6k weekly downloads against 5.7k
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CodeWhale and Hermes Agent, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | CodeWhaleHmbown/CodeWhale | Hermes Agentnousresearch/hermes-agent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 84.3 | 85.1 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #102 | #92 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #7 | #6 |
| GitHub stars | 41.1k | 254.3k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.1 / 10 | 6.4 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 6k/wk | 213k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 16.8 | 15.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.7 | 13.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.1 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, ElevenLabs, … |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Unknown |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →