Registry › Compare › CodeWhale vs ECC

CodeWhale vs ECC

ECC leads on trust: 91.0/100 (Grade A) against 83.3/100 (Grade A), a 7.7-point gap. ECC leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A CodeWhale 83.3

Open-source agent for the terminal written in Rust. Use any provider or model. Issues & PRs always welcome

Hmbown/CodeWhale · #114 overall · #8 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

CodeWhale doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A ECC 91.0

The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.

affaan-m/ECC · #18 overall · #2 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose ECC if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

  • +3.6Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 22%
  • +2.8Adoption: 21.7k weekly downloads against 5.6k

Where they differ

16.0
Safety / IntegrityECC +3.6
19.6
13.5
TransparencyCodeWhale +0.2
13.3
20.0
MaintenanceCodeWhale +0.1
19.9
16.1
AdoptionECC +2.8
18.9
-0.3
Runtime calibrationECC +1.6
+1.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CodeWhale and ECC, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal CodeWhaleHmbown/CodeWhale ECCaffaan-m/ECC
HVTrust score 83.3 91.0
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #114 #18
Rank in Coding Agents #8 #2
GitHub stars 41.2k 294.5k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 5.7 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 6k/wk 22k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.0 19.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.3
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 16.1 18.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers — 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → CodeWhale profile ECC profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →