CodeWhale vs ECC
ECC leads on trust: 90.4/100 (Grade A) against 84.3/100 (Grade A), a 6.1-point gap. ECC leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.
Open-source Rust agent engine and terminal client for Codewhale, with provider choice, tools, approvals and receipts.
CodeWhale doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Choose ECC if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +2.5Adoption: 14.1k weekly downloads against 5.7k
- +2.3Safety / Integrity: 89% of recent commits signed, against 33%
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CodeWhale and ECC, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | CodeWhaleHmbown/CodeWhale | ECCaffaan-m/ECC |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 84.3 | 90.4 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #102 | #21 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 41.1k | 281.1k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.1 / 10 | 5.7 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 6k/wk | 14k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 16.8 | 19.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.7 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.1 | 18.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →