RegistryCompare › Codebase Memory MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

Codebase Memory MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 91.0/100 (Grade A) vs 85.4/100 (Grade A), a 5.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
HVTrust score 91.0 85.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #9 #49
Rank in MCP Servers #1 #5
GitHub stars 39.0k 6.2k
Last updated today 3d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10 5.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 5k/wk 65k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.4 16.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.9 12.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.9
Adoption / 20 15.9 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile XcodeBuildMCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →