RegistryCompare › Codebase Memory MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

Codebase Memory MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 90.4/100 (Grade A) vs 86.3/100 (Grade A), a 4.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
HVTrust score 90.4 86.3
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #8 #27
Rank in MCP Servers #1 #3
GitHub stars 31.6k 6.1k
Last updated 1d ago 3d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10 5.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 5k/wk 65k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.6 17.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 13.5
Maintenance / 20 19.9 16.4
Adoption / 20 15.7 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile XcodeBuildMCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →