Registry › Compare › Codebase Memory MCP vs Stripe Agent Toolkit

Codebase Memory MCP vs Stripe Agent Toolkit

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust: 90.3/100 (Grade A) against 84.6/100 (Grade A), a 5.7-point gap. Codebase Memory MCP leads on maintenance and adoption.

A Codebase Memory MCP 90.3

High-performance code intelligence MCP server. Indexes codebases into a persistent knowledge graph — average repo in milliseconds. 158 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens. Single static binary, zero dependencies.

DeusData/codebase-memory-mcp · #20 overall · #3 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Codebase Memory MCP if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+1.8Maintenance
+1.8Adoption: 46.5k GitHub stars against 1.9k
+1.6Safety / Integrity: 28% of recent commits signed, against 27%
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 6.1

A Stripe Agent Toolkit 84.6

One-stop shop for building AI-powered products and businesses with Stripe.

stripe/ai · #101 overall · #35 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Stripe Agent Toolkit doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

18.1

Safety / IntegrityCodebase Memory MCP +1.6

16.5

14.8

TransparencyCodebase Memory MCP +1.1

13.7

19.9

MaintenanceCodebase Memory MCP +1.8

18.1

15.4

AdoptionCodebase Memory MCP +1.8

13.6

+4.1

Runtime calibrationStripe Agent Toolkit +0.6

+4.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and Stripe Agent Toolkit, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp	Stripe Agent Toolkitstripe/ai
HVTrust score	90.3	84.6
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#20	#101
Rank in MCP Servers	#3	#35
GitHub stars	46.5k	1.9k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.4 / 10	6.1 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	1k/wk	19k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.1	16.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.8	13.7
Maintenance / 20	19.9	18.1
Adoption / 20	15.4	13.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile Stripe Agent Toolkit profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →