RegistryCompare › Codebase Memory MCP vs SearXNG Search

Codebase Memory MCP vs SearXNG Search

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and SearXNG Search, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 92.0/100 (Grade A) vs 88.8/100 (Grade A), a 3.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp SearXNG Searchihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
HVTrust score 92.0 88.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #4 #16
Rank in MCP Servers #1 #2
GitHub stars 41.9k 1.2k
Last updated 1d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10 8.7 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 5k/wk 15k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.7 18.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 15.9
Maintenance / 20 19.9 18.8
Adoption / 20 16.0 12.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile SearXNG Search profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →