RegistryCompare › Codebase Memory MCP vs Playwright MCP

Codebase Memory MCP vs Playwright MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 90.4/100 (Grade A) vs 89.5/100 (Grade A), a 0.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score 90.4 89.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #8 #9
Rank in MCP Servers #1 #2
GitHub stars 31.5k 35.1k
Last updated 1d ago 6d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10 6.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 5k/wk 6.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.6 20.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 14.1
Maintenance / 20 19.9 13.6
Adoption / 20 15.7 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →