Registry › Compare › Codebase Memory MCP vs Playwright MCP

Codebase Memory MCP vs Playwright MCP

Both are Grade A and 1.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Codebase Memory MCP leads on transparency and maintenance; Playwright MCP leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A Codebase Memory MCP 90.3

High-performance code intelligence MCP server. Indexes codebases into a persistent knowledge graph — average repo in milliseconds. 158 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens. Single static binary, zero dependencies.

DeusData/codebase-memory-mcp · #19 overall · #3 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Codebase Memory MCP if transparency and maintenance matter most.

+3.1Maintenance: last push today, against 5d ago
+1.2Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 5.9

A Playwright MCP 91.5

Playwright MCP server

microsoft/playwright-mcp · #15 overall · #2 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Playwright MCP if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.6Adoption: 6.5M weekly downloads against 1.4k
+1.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 28%

Where they differ

18.0

Safety / IntegrityPlaywright MCP +1.9

19.9

14.7

TransparencyCodebase Memory MCP +1.2

13.5

20.0

MaintenanceCodebase Memory MCP +3.1

16.9

15.4

AdoptionPlaywright MCP +4.6

20.0

+4.2

Runtime calibrationCodebase Memory MCP +1.0

+3.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp	Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score	90.3	91.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#19	#15
Rank in MCP Servers	#3	#2
GitHub stars	46.5k	38.1k
Last updated	today	5d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.3 / 10	5.9 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	1k/wk	6.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.0	19.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.7	13.5
Maintenance / 20	20.0	16.9
Adoption / 20	15.4	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →