RegistryCompare › Codebase Memory MCP vs Hevy MCP Server

Codebase Memory MCP vs Hevy MCP Server

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and Hevy MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 92.1/100 (Grade A) vs 87.1/100 (Grade A), a 5.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp Hevy MCP Serverchrisdoc/hevy-mcp
HVTrust score 92.1 87.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #5 #34
Rank in MCP Servers #1 #7
GitHub stars 41.9k 449
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 5k/wk 6k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.7 20.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.0 11.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile Hevy MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →