Registry › Compare › Codebase Memory MCP vs Gitlab MCP

Codebase Memory MCP vs Gitlab MCP

Both are Grade A and 2.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Codebase Memory MCP leads on adoption.

A Codebase Memory MCP 93.3

Local code intelligence for developers and AI agents. Connect code, docs and infrastructure in a persistent graph, with CBM Lens, MCP tools, agent integrations and change-aware test selection.

DeusData/codebase-memory-mcp · #7 overall · #1 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Codebase Memory MCP if adoption matters most.

+1.8Adoption: 48.5k GitHub stars against 2.1k

A Gitlab MCP 90.9

MCP server for GitLab: 277 tools for projects, MRs, issues, pipelines, wikis and more via the GitLab REST/GraphQL API

zereight/gitlab-mcp · #18 overall · #4 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Gitlab MCP doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

20.3

Safety / IntegrityCodebase Memory MCP +0.4

19.9

15.7

TransparencyCodebase Memory MCP +0.1

15.6

20.0

MaintenanceCodebase Memory MCP +0.1

19.9

16.8

AdoptionCodebase Memory MCP +1.8

15.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and Gitlab MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp	Gitlab MCPzereight/gitlab-mcp
HVTrust score	93.3	90.9
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#7	#18
Rank in MCP Servers	#1	#4
GitHub stars	48.5k	2.1k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	8.5 / 10	8.3 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	15k/wk	172k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.3	19.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	15.7	15.6
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.9
Adoption / 20	16.8	15.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile Gitlab MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →