RegistryCompare › Cloudflare Agents vs PydanticAI

Cloudflare Agents vs PydanticAI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cloudflare Agents and PydanticAI, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

PydanticAI leads on trust — 89.3/100 (Grade A) vs 88.9/100 (Grade A), a 0.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cloudflare Agentscloudflare/agents PydanticAIpydantic/pydantic-ai
HVTrust score 88.9 89.3
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #30 #23
Rank in Agent Frameworks #8 #7
GitHub stars 5.6k 20.0k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 6.4 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 891k/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.9 20.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.8 13.9
Maintenance / 20 19.1 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.9 18.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI 8 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cloudflare Agents profile PydanticAI profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →