RegistryCompare › Cloudflare Agents vs PydanticAI

Cloudflare Agents vs PydanticAI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cloudflare Agents and PydanticAI, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cloudflare Agents leads on trust — 88.7/100 (Grade A) vs 87.6/100 (Grade A), a 1.1-point gap. Note: Cloudflare Agents's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cloudflare Agentscloudflare/agents PydanticAIpydantic/pydantic-ai
HVTrust score 88.7 87.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #14 #19
Rank in Agent Frameworks #4 #6
GitHub stars 5.3k 19.1k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10 6.7 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 777k/wk 8.0M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.3 15.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.0 14.2
Maintenance / 20 19.3 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.8 19.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cloudflare Agents profile PydanticAI profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →