RegistryCompare › Cline vs OpenHands

Cline vs OpenHands

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cline and OpenHands, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cline leads on trust — 92.1/100 (Grade A) vs 74.8/100 (Grade B), a 17.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Clinecline/cline OpenHandsOpenHands/OpenHands
HVTrust score 92.1 74.8
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #6 #222
Rank in Coding Agents #1 #10
GitHub stars 67.9k 87.8k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10 4.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 5.3M/wk 41k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.9 10.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.9 12.1
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cline profile OpenHands profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →