Registry › Compare › CLI-Anything vs Pi MCP Adapter

CLI-Anything vs Pi MCP Adapter

Both score 73.5/100, so choose on what you weigh most. CLI-Anything leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance; Pi MCP Adapter leads on maintenance.

B CLI-Anything 73.5

"CLI-Anything: Making ALL Software Agent-Native" -- CLI-Hub: https://clianything.cc/

HKUDS/CLI-Anything · #294 overall · #14 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose CLI-Anything if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+5.7Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none

B Pi MCP Adapter 73.5

Token-efficient MCP adapter for Pi coding agent

nicobailon/pi-mcp-adapter · #293 overall · #13 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Pi MCP Adapter if maintenance matters most.

+10.6Maintenance: last push 4d ago, against 49d ago

Where they differ

15.7

Safety / IntegrityCLI-Anything +5.7

10.0

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceCLI-Anything +7.2

10.8

11.8

TransparencyPi MCP Adapter +0.4

12.2

8.7

MaintenancePi MCP Adapter +10.6

19.3

15.6

AdoptionCLI-Anything +0.4

15.2

+3.7

Runtime calibrationPi MCP Adapter +2.3

+6.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and Pi MCP Adapter, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything	Pi MCP Adapternicobailon/pi-mcp-adapter
HVTrust score	73.5	73.5
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#294	#293
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#14	#13
GitHub stars	58.5k	1.6k
Last updated	49d ago	4d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	3.9 / 10	4.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	1k/wk	441k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	15.7	10.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	11.8	12.2
Maintenance / 20	8.7	19.3
Adoption / 20	15.6	15.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → CLI-Anything profile Pi MCP Adapter profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →