RegistryCompare › CLI-Anything vs mcp-proxy

CLI-Anything vs mcp-proxy

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and mcp-proxy, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

CLI-Anything leads on trust — 80.0/100 (Grade A) vs 78.5/100 (Grade B), a 1.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything mcp-proxysparfenyuk/mcp-proxy
HVTrust score 80.0 78.5
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #65 #69
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #5 #6
GitHub stars 47.1k 2.7k
Last updated 2d ago 26d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10 5.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 2k/wk 438k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.1 16.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.8 12.9
Maintenance / 20 16.7 10.3
Adoption / 20 15.7 15.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → CLI-Anything profile mcp-proxy profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →