RegistryCompare › CLI-Anything vs mcp-proxy

CLI-Anything vs mcp-proxy

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and mcp-proxy, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

mcp-proxy leads on trust — 81.1/100 (Grade A) vs 79.2/100 (Grade B), a 1.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything mcp-proxysparfenyuk/mcp-proxy
HVTrust score 79.2 81.1
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #64 #58
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #5 #4
GitHub stars 46.6k 2.7k
Last updated 1d ago 15d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10 5.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 2k/wk 292k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.2 17.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.9 13.4
Maintenance / 20 17.6 11.0
Adoption / 20 15.7 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface marketplace
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → CLI-Anything profile mcp-proxy profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →