CLI-Anything vs mcp-proxy
mcp-proxy leads on trust: 87.0/100 (Grade A) against 74.3/100 (Grade B), a 12.7-point gap. CLI-Anything leads on adoption; mcp-proxy leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance.
"CLI-Anything: Making ALL Software Agent-Native" -- CLI-Hub: https://clianything.cc/
Choose CLI-Anything if adoption matters most.
- +1.1Adoption: 58.1k GitHub stars against 2.8k
A bridge between Streamable HTTP and stdio MCP transports
Choose mcp-proxy if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.
- +9.3Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 42d ago
- +2.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 3.9
- +1.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 3.9
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and mcp-proxy, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything | mcp-proxysparfenyuk/mcp-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 74.3 | 87.0 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #278 | #75 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #12 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 58.1k | 2.8k |
| Last updated | 42d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 3.9 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 2k/wk | 84k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 15.7 | 18.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 11.8 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 9.2 | 18.5 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.9 | 14.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | — |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →