RegistryCompare › CLI-Anything vs MCP Apps

CLI-Anything vs MCP Apps

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and MCP Apps, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

CLI-Anything leads on trust — 79.2/100 (Grade B) vs 73.4/100 (Grade B), a 5.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything MCP Appsmodelcontextprotocol/ext-apps
HVTrust score 79.2 73.4
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #64 #87
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #5 #7
GitHub stars 46.6k 2.7k
Last updated 1d ago 12d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 2k/wk 1.6M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.2 12.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.9 8.5
Maintenance / 20 17.6 13.2
Adoption / 20 15.7 16.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface marketplace marketplace
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → CLI-Anything profile MCP Apps profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →