CLI-Anything vs MCP Apps
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and MCP Apps, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
MCP Apps leads on trust — 88.9/100 (Grade A) vs 78.6/100 (Grade B), a 10.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything | MCP Appsmodelcontextprotocol/ext-apps |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 78.6 | 88.9 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #164 | #30 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 49.6k | 2.9k |
| Last updated | 28d ago | 2d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 3.9 / 10 | 5.8 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 926/wk | 3.5M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 15.3 | 18.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 11.8 | 13.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 14.6 | 17.8 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.2 | 17.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
CLI-Anything profile
MCP Apps profile
More Protocols & Tool Integration →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →