Registry › Compare › CLI-Anything vs Composio

CLI-Anything vs Composio

CLI-Anything leads on trust: 79.0/100 (Grade B) against 73.5/100 (Grade B), a 5.5-point gap. CLI-Anything leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance; Composio leads on transparency and maintenance, and rests on broader evidence. Note: CLI-Anything's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B CLI-Anything 79.0

"CLI-Anything: Making ALL Software Agent-Native" -- CLI-Hub: https://clianything.cc/

HKUDS/CLI-Anything · #188 overall · #11 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose CLI-Anything if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+4.8Safety / Integrity: 66% of recent commits signed, against 51%

B Composio 73.5

Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.

composiohq/composio · #282 overall · #14 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Composio if transparency and maintenance matter most.

+6.1Maintenance: last push today, against 29d ago
+2.4Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 3.9
+1.0Adoption: 37.9k weekly downloads against 2.3k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

15.7

Safety / IntegrityCLI-Anything +4.8

10.9

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceCLI-Anything +7.2

10.8

11.8

TransparencyComposio +2.4

14.2

13.9

MaintenanceComposio +6.1

20.0

15.9

AdoptionComposio +1.0

16.9

+3.7

Runtime calibrationCLI-Anything +3.0

+0.7

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and Composio, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything	Composiocomposiohq/composio
HVTrust score	79.0	73.5
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#188	#282
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#11	#14
GitHub stars	55.9k	30.7k
Last updated	29d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	3.9 / 10	6.7 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	2k/wk	38k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	15.7	10.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	11.8	14.2
Maintenance / 20	13.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.9	16.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Declared
External providers	1 — Anthropic	1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Partial

Open in the live compare tool → CLI-Anything profile Composio profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →