Registry › Compare › Claude Mem vs Larksuite Cli

Claude Mem vs Larksuite Cli

Both are Grade A and 0.9 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Claude Mem leads on maintenance and adoption; Larksuite Cli leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A Claude Mem 90.2

Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More

thedotmack/claude-mem · #4 overall · #4 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Claude Mem if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+2.6Maintenance
+0.8Adoption: 115.5k GitHub stars against 18k

A Larksuite Cli 89.3

The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.

larksuite/cli · #5 overall · #5 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Larksuite Cli if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 91%
+1.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.1 against 4.6

Where they differ

17.8

Safety / IntegrityLarksuite Cli +2.3

20.1

12.4

TransparencyLarksuite Cli +1.3

13.7

20.0

MaintenanceClaude Mem +2.6

17.4

18.2

AdoptionClaude Mem +0.8

17.4

+3.8

Runtime calibrationClaude Mem +1.1

+2.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Claude Mem and Larksuite Cli, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Claude Memthedotmack/claude-mem	Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli
HVTrust score	90.2	89.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#4	#5
Rank in Agent Skills	#4	#5
GitHub stars	115.5k	18.0k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.6 / 10	6.1 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	36k/wk	229k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.8	20.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.4	13.7
Maintenance / 20	20.0	17.4
Adoption / 20	18.2	17.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Claude Mem profile Larksuite Cli profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →