Claude Mem vs ffmpeg-skill
Both are Grade A and 0.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Claude Mem leads on adoption; ffmpeg-skill leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More
Choose Claude Mem if adoption matters most.
- +4.5Adoption: 100.5k weekly downloads against 9.5k
Local video editor for coding agents: 42 FFmpeg tools with a machine-readable contract and an MCP server, for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Cut, captions, reframe, loudness, platform exports. No cloud, no API keys.
Choose ffmpeg-skill if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +2.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 4.6
- +1.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 4.6
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Claude Mem and ffmpeg-skill, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Claude Memthedotmack/claude-mem | ffmpeg-skillkajisho5/ffmpeg-skill |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 90.5 | 90.0 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #3 | #4 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #3 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 117.2k | 5.6k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.6 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 100k/wk | 9k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 17.7 | 19.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.4 | 14.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.8 | 14.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →