RegistryCompare › Chrome DevTools MCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

Chrome DevTools MCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Chrome DevTools MCP and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 86.3/100 (Grade A) vs 74.5/100 (Grade B), a 11.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score 74.5 86.3
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #90 #37
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #8 #4
GitHub stars 49.2k 3.3k
Last updated 1d ago 3d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.6 / 10 4.4 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 523k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.8 16.1
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.8 12.2
Maintenance / 20 19.9 18.5
Adoption / 20 11.3 16.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Chrome DevTools MCP profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →