RegistryCompare › Chrome DevTools MCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

Chrome DevTools MCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Chrome DevTools MCP and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 85.9/100 (Grade A) vs 70.9/100 (Grade B), a 15.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score 70.9 85.9
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #99 #35
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #8 #3
GitHub stars 48.5k 3.2k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10 4.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 523k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.6 16.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 12.5
Maintenance / 20 19.7 17.7
Adoption / 20 11.2 16.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface marketplace plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Chrome DevTools MCP profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →