RegistryCompare › Chrome DevTools MCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

Chrome DevTools MCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Chrome DevTools MCP and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 87.2/100 (Grade A) vs 73.9/100 (Grade B), a 13.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score 73.9 87.2
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #95 #36
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #8 #3
GitHub stars 52.4k 3.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10 4.6 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 377k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.4 17.0
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.6 12.4
Maintenance / 20 19.9 18.8
Adoption / 20 11.3 15.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Chrome DevTools MCP profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →