Registry › Compare › Cherry Studio vs ToolJet

Cherry Studio vs ToolJet

Cherry Studio leads on trust: 67.1/100 (Grade B) against 63.9/100 (Grade C), a 3.2-point gap. Cherry Studio leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

B Cherry Studio 67.1

Your AI workspace for models, agents, and productivity.

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · #449 overall · #8 UI & App Builders · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Cherry Studio if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+3.4Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 55%
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 5.1

C ToolJet 63.9

Open-source foundation of ToolJet AI - the enterprise app generation platform for internal tools, dashboards, business applications, workflows and AI agents. Build visually, from a prompt, or from Claude Code, Codex and Cursor over MCP 🚀

ToolJet/ToolJet · #567 overall · #9 UI & App Builders · coverage C (2/5)

ToolJet doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

12.5

Safety / IntegrityCherry Studio +3.4

9.1

13.6

TransparencyCherry Studio +0.8

12.8

11.3

AdoptionCherry Studio +0.2

11.1

-1.1

Runtime calibrationToolJet +1.2

+0.1

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cherry Studio and ToolJet, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Cherry StudioCherryHQ/cherry-studio	ToolJetToolJet/ToolJet
HVTrust score	67.1	63.9
Evidence grade	B	C
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#449	#567
Rank in UI & App Builders	#8	#9
GitHub stars	53.3k	41.2k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.0 / 10	5.1 / 10
License	AGPL-3.0	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.5	9.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.6	12.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.3	11.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	6 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Firecrawl, …	3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	extensions	plugins
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Cherry Studio profile ToolJet profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →