Registry › Compare › Cherry Studio vs LibreChat

Cherry Studio vs LibreChat

LibreChat leads on trust: 73.5/100 (Grade B) against 67.0/100 (Grade B), a 6.5-point gap. Cherry Studio leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; LibreChat leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence.

B Cherry Studio 67.0

Your AI workspace for models, agents, and productivity.

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · #454 overall · #8 UI & App Builders · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Cherry Studio if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+1.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 5.0
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 5.0

B LibreChat 73.5

Enhanced ChatGPT Clone: Features Agents, MCP, Skills, DeepSeek, Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, Responses API, Azure, Groq, o1, GPT-5, Mistral, OpenRouter, Vertex AI, Gemini, Artifacts, AI model switching, message search, Code Interpreter, langchain, DALL-E-3, OpenAPI Actions, Functions, Secure Multi-User…

LibreChat-AI/LibreChat · #289 overall · #6 UI & App Builders · coverage A (4/5)

Choose LibreChat if adoption matters most.

+7.6Adoption
A vs CEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

12.5

Safety / IntegrityCherry Studio +1.3

11.2

13.6

TransparencyCherry Studio +0.8

12.8

11.3

AdoptionLibreChat +7.6

18.9

-1.1

Runtime calibrationLibreChat +1.0

-0.1

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cherry Studio and LibreChat, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Cherry StudioCherryHQ/cherry-studio	LibreChatLibreChat-AI/LibreChat
HVTrust score	67.0	73.5
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	A
Overall rank	#454	#289
Rank in UI & App Builders	#8	#6
GitHub stars	53.2k	46.7k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.0 / 10	5.0 / 10
License	AGPL-3.0	MIT
Downloads	—	637k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.5	11.2
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.6	12.8
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.9
Adoption / 20	11.3	18.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	6 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Firecrawl, …	4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	extensions	plugins
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Cherry Studio profile LibreChat profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →