RegistryCompare › Cc Safety Net vs Skill Scanner

Cc Safety Net vs Skill Scanner

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Skill Scanner, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cc Safety Net leads on trust — 86.5/100 (Grade A) vs 83.1/100 (Grade A), a 3.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net Skill Scannercisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner
HVTrust score 86.5 83.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #2 #3
Rank in Agent Skills #2 #3
GitHub stars 1.5k 2.5k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 6.1 / 10
License MIT NOASSERTION
Downloads 2k/wk 118k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.9 19.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.6 13.7
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.1
Adoption / 20 12.0 14.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile Skill Scanner profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →