Registry › Compare › Cc Safety Net vs Skill Scanner

Cc Safety Net vs Skill Scanner

Both are Grade A and 1.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Cc Safety Net leads on maintenance; Skill Scanner leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A Cc Safety Net 87.1

A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Devin CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build…

kenryu42/cc-safety-net · #7 overall · #7 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Cc Safety Net if maintenance matters most.

+1.5Maintenance

A Skill Scanner 85.6

Security Scanner for Agent Skills

cisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner · #10 overall · #10 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Skill Scanner if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+1.6Adoption: 99.2k weekly downloads against 14.8k
+1.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 93%

Where they differ

19.5

Safety / IntegritySkill Scanner +1.0

20.5

13.5

TransparencySkill Scanner +0.4

13.9

20.0

MaintenanceCc Safety Net +1.5

18.5

13.3

AdoptionSkill Scanner +1.6

14.9

+2.8

Runtime calibrationCc Safety Net +3.0

-0.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Skill Scanner, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net	Skill Scannercisco-ai-defense/skill-scanner
HVTrust score	87.1	85.6
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#7	#10
Rank in Agent Skills	#7	#10
GitHub stars	1.7k	2.6k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.9 / 10	6.4 / 10
License	MIT	NOASSERTION
Downloads	15k/wk	99k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.5	20.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.5	13.9
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.5
Adoption / 20	13.3	14.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	—
External providers	1 — Anthropic	5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile Skill Scanner profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →