Cc Safety Net vs OmniRoute
Both are Grade A and 4.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. OmniRoute leads on adoption.
A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Devin CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build…
Cc Safety Net doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Never stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 375 providers (150+ free), 1,400+ models Kimi, Claude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A…
Choose OmniRoute if adoption matters most.
- +4.6Adoption: 41.9k weekly downloads against 14.8k
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and OmniRoute, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net | OmniRoutediegosouzapw/OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 87.1 | 91.6 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #7 | #2 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 1.7k | 79.4k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.9 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 15k/wk | 42k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.5 | 19.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.5 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.3 | 17.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 1 — OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →