Registry › Compare › Cc Safety Net vs MisakaNet

Cc Safety Net vs MisakaNet

Both are Grade A and 0.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Cc Safety Net leads on adoption; MisakaNet leads on supply-chain integrity.

A Cc Safety Net 87.1

A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Devin CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build…

kenryu42/cc-safety-net · #7 overall · #7 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Cc Safety Net if adoption matters most.

  • +2.6Adoption: 14.8k weekly downloads against 1.2k
A MisakaNet 86.8

📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. | https://misakanet.org

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet · #8 overall · #8 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose MisakaNet if supply-chain integrity matters most.

  • +0.7Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 93%

Where they differ

19.5
Safety / IntegrityMisakaNet +0.7
20.2
13.5
TransparencyMisakaNet +0.3
13.8
13.3
AdoptionCc Safety Net +2.6
10.7
+2.8
Runtime calibrationMisakaNet +1.3
+4.1

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and MisakaNet, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net MisakaNetIkalus1988/MisakaNet
HVTrust score 87.1 86.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #7 #8
Rank in Agent Skills #7 #8
GitHub stars 1.7k 544
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 15k/wk 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.5 20.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 13.3 10.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server — Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 2 — Anthropic, DeepSeek
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile MisakaNet profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →