RegistryCompare › Cc Safety Net vs Larksuite Cli

Cc Safety Net vs Larksuite Cli

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Larksuite Cli, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Larksuite Cli leads on trust — 80.0/100 (Grade A) vs 74.5/100 (Grade B), a 5.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli
HVTrust score 74.5 80.0
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #2 #1
Rank in Agent Skills #2 #1
GitHub stars 1.5k 16.4k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard
License MIT MIT
Downloads 2k/wk 157k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.3 12.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 8.5 8.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 12.0 17.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile Larksuite Cli profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →