Cc Safety Net vs Larksuite Cli
Both are Grade A and 1.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Cc Safety Net leads on maintenance; Larksuite Cli leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.
A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Devin CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build…
Choose Cc Safety Net if maintenance matters most.
- +2.5Maintenance
The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.
Choose Larksuite Cli if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +3.2Adoption: 229.3k weekly downloads against 49.6k
- +0.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 89%
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Larksuite Cli, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net | Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 87.6 | 89.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #8 | #5 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #8 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 2.0k | 18.0k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.9 / 10 | 6.1 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 50k/wk | 229k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.3 | 20.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.5 | 13.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 17.4 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.2 | 17.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →