Cc Safety Net vs Larksuite Cli
Both are Grade A and 3.8 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Larksuite Cli leads on adoption and supply-chain integrity.
A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build, Hermes Agent, Kimi…
Cc Safety Net doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.
Choose Larksuite Cli if adoption and supply-chain integrity matter most.
- +4.0Adoption: 77.2k weekly downloads against 5.9k
- +0.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 87%
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Transparency 13.6 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Larksuite Cli, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net | Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 86.6 | 90.4 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #7 | #2 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 1.6k | 17.5k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 2d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.0 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 6k/wk | 77k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.4 | 20.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.6 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 12.7 | 16.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →