RegistryCompare › Cc Safety Net vs DSH Better Sidebar

Cc Safety Net vs DSH Better Sidebar

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and DSH Better Sidebar, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cc Safety Net leads on trust — 86.7/100 (Grade A) vs 83.0/100 (Grade A), a 3.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net DSH Better Sidebaromdsh-dev/DSH-better-sidebar
HVTrust score 86.7 83.0
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #5 #10
Rank in Agent Skills #5 #10
GitHub stars 1.5k 3.6k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 4.4 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 4k/wk 67k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.7 13.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.6 12.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 12.5 15.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — DeepSeek
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile DSH Better Sidebar profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →