RegistryCompare › Cc Safety Net vs Dev Browser

Cc Safety Net vs Dev Browser

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Dev Browser, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cc Safety Net leads on trust — 74.5/100 (Grade B) vs 65.3/100 (Grade B), a 9.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net Dev BrowserSawyerHood/dev-browser
HVTrust score 74.5 65.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #2 #5
Rank in Agent Skills #2 #5
GitHub stars 1.5k 6.5k
Last updated today 28d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard
License MIT MIT
Downloads 2k/wk 5k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.3 8.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 8.5 8.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 12.5
Adoption / 20 12.0 14.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile Dev Browser profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →