RegistryCompare › Cc Safety Net vs Dev Browser

Cc Safety Net vs Dev Browser

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Dev Browser, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cc Safety Net leads on trust — 86.7/100 (Grade A) vs 77.1/100 (Grade B), a 9.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net Dev BrowserSawyerHood/dev-browser
HVTrust score 86.7 77.1
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #5 #24
Rank in Agent Skills #5 #24
GitHub stars 1.5k 6.6k
Last updated today 8d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 4.0 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 4k/wk 3k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.7 14.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.6 11.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 15.5
Adoption / 20 12.5 13.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile Dev Browser profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →