Registry › Compare › Cc Safety Net vs Claude Mem

Cc Safety Net vs Claude Mem

Both are Grade A and 2.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Cc Safety Net leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Claude Mem leads on adoption.

A Cc Safety Net 87.6

A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Devin CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build…

kenryu42/cc-safety-net · #8 overall · #8 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Cc Safety Net if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+1.5Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.6
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.6

A Claude Mem 90.2

Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More

thedotmack/claude-mem · #4 overall · #4 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Claude Mem if adoption matters most.

+4.0Adoption: 115.5k GitHub stars against 2k

Where they differ

19.3

Safety / IntegrityCc Safety Net +1.5

17.8

13.5

TransparencyCc Safety Net +1.1

12.4

19.9

MaintenanceClaude Mem +0.1

20.0

14.2

AdoptionClaude Mem +4.0

18.2

+2.7

Runtime calibrationClaude Mem +1.1

+3.8

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cc Safety Net and Claude Mem, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net	Claude Memthedotmack/claude-mem
HVTrust score	87.6	90.2
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#8	#4
Rank in Agent Skills	#8	#4
GitHub stars	2.0k	115.5k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.9 / 10	4.6 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	50k/wk	36k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.3	17.8
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.5	12.4
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	14.2	18.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Cc Safety Net profile Claude Mem profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →