Registry › Compare › Career Ops vs Reactive Resume

Career Ops vs Reactive Resume

Both are Grade B and 0.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Career Ops leads on adoption.

B Career Ops 68.4

Open-source AI job search agent and job finder: scan job boards, score each job 1-5 against your CV before you apply, tailor an ATS-friendly resume and cover letter, get interview prep and a job application tracker. It helps you fill in each application; you press Submit. Runs locally in your AI…

career-ops-hq/career-ops · #35 overall · #35 Agent Skills · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Career Ops if adoption matters most.

+0.6Adoption: 74k GitHub stars against 44.1k

B Reactive Resume 68.0

A one-of-a-kind resume builder that keeps your privacy in mind. Completely secure, customizable, portable, open-source and free forever. Try it out today!

reactive-resume/reactive-resume · #37 overall · #37 Agent Skills · coverage C (2/5)

Reactive Resume doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

13.6

Safety / IntegrityCareer Ops +0.1

13.5

14.4

TransparencyCareer Ops +0.1

14.3

20.0

MaintenanceCareer Ops +0.1

19.9

11.7

AdoptionCareer Ops +0.6

11.1

-2.1

Runtime calibrationReactive Resume +0.5

-1.6

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Career Ops and Reactive Resume, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Career Opscareer-ops-hq/career-ops	Reactive Resumereactive-resume/reactive-resume
HVTrust score	68.4	68.0
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#35	#37
Rank in Agent Skills	#35	#37
GitHub stars	74.0k	44.1k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.9 / 10	6.8 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.6	13.5
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.4	14.3
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.9
Adoption / 20	11.7	11.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini	7 — Anthropic, Cohere, DeepSeek, …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Career Ops profile Reactive Resume profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →