Registry › Compare › Cap Js MCP Server vs KiCad MCP Pro

Cap Js MCP Server vs KiCad MCP Pro

Both are Grade A and 0.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Cap Js MCP Server leads on adoption; KiCad MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance.

A Cap Js MCP Server 88.4

MCP server for AI-assisted development of CAP applications

cap-js/mcp-server · #55 overall · #15 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Cap Js MCP Server if adoption matters most.

+0.7Adoption: 68.1k weekly downloads against 8.4k

A KiCad MCP Pro 88.5

MCP server for KiCad, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, ERC/DRC validation, DFM checks, BOM analysis, and manufacturing preparation—with controlled edits and human-gated release workflows.

oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro · #52 overall · #13 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose KiCad MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+2.9Maintenance: last push today, against 5d ago
+1.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 94%
+0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 7.9

Where they differ

22.1

Safety / IntegrityKiCad MCP Pro +1.0

23.1

15.2

TransparencyKiCad MCP Pro +0.5

15.7

17.1

MaintenanceKiCad MCP Pro +2.9

20.0

11.4

AdoptionCap Js MCP Server +0.7

10.7

+4.6

Runtime calibrationCap Js MCP Server +3.6

+1.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cap Js MCP Server and KiCad MCP Pro, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Cap Js MCP Servercap-js/mcp-server	KiCad MCP Prooaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro
HVTrust score	88.4	88.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#55	#52
Rank in MCP Servers	#15	#13
GitHub stars	118	190
Last updated	5d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.9 / 10	8.5 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	68k/wk	8k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	22.1	23.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	15.2	15.7
Maintenance / 20	17.1	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.4	10.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Cap Js MCP Server profile KiCad MCP Pro profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →