RegistryCompare › Canvas MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

Canvas MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Canvas MCP and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Canvas MCP leads on trust — 87.2/100 (Grade A) vs 81.0/100 (Grade A), a 6.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Canvas MCPvishalsachdev/canvas-mcp XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
HVTrust score 87.2 81.0
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #44 #123
Rank in MCP Servers #11 #56
GitHub stars 243 6.4k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10 5.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 163/wk 51k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.5 16.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.0 12.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 11.9
Adoption / 20 8.7 15.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Canvas MCP profile XcodeBuildMCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →