Registry › Compare › Camofox Browser vs Skyvern

Camofox Browser vs Skyvern

Skyvern leads on trust: 86.9/100 (Grade A) against 81.7/100 (Grade A), a 5.2-point gap. Camofox Browser leads on adoption; Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.

A Camofox Browser 81.7

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

jo-inc/camofox-browser · #128 overall · #7 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Camofox Browser if adoption matters most.

+1.1Adoption: 30.6k weekly downloads against 1.2k

A Skyvern 86.9

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Skyvern-AI/skyvern · #57 overall · #6 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+7.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 3%
+2.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 4.9
+0.9Maintenance: last push today, against 4d ago
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

13.8

Safety / IntegritySkyvern +7.9

21.7

12.7

TransparencySkyvern +2.1

14.8

19.1

MaintenanceSkyvern +0.9

20.0

15.7

AdoptionCamofox Browser +1.1

14.6

+2.4

Runtime calibrationCamofox Browser +4.6

-2.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Camofox Browser and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser	SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score	81.7	86.9
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#128	#57
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#7	#6
GitHub stars	11.2k	23.1k
Last updated	4d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	31k/wk	1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.8	21.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.7	14.8
Maintenance / 20	19.1	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.7	14.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	—	5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Camofox Browser profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →