Registry › Compare › Camofox Browser vs Skyvern

Camofox Browser vs Skyvern

Skyvern leads on trust: 86.2/100 (Grade A) against 80.2/100 (Grade A), a 6.0-point gap. Camofox Browser leads on adoption; Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance, and rests on broader evidence.

A Camofox Browser 80.2

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

jo-inc/camofox-browser · #163 overall · #9 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Camofox Browser if adoption matters most.

+0.6Adoption: 15.3k weekly downloads against 1.6k

A Skyvern 86.2

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Skyvern-AI/skyvern · #79 overall · #8 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+7.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 8%
+2.2Maintenance: last push today, against 9d ago
+1.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.0 against 4.9
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

14.0

Safety / IntegritySkyvern +7.2

21.2

12.7

TransparencySkyvern +1.7

14.4

17.8

MaintenanceSkyvern +2.2

20.0

15.3

AdoptionCamofox Browser +0.6

14.7

+2.4

Runtime calibrationCamofox Browser +4.5

-2.1

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Camofox Browser and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser	SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score	80.2	86.2
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#163	#79
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#9	#8
GitHub stars	11.6k	23.2k
Last updated	9d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	7.0 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	15k/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	14.0	21.2
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.7	14.4
Maintenance / 20	17.8	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.3	14.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	—	5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Camofox Browser profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →