Registry › Compare › Camofox Browser vs Skyvern

Camofox Browser vs Skyvern

Skyvern leads on trust: 87.3/100 (Grade A) against 80.5/100 (Grade A), a 6.8-point gap. Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.

A Camofox Browser 80.5

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

jo-inc/camofox-browser · #176 overall · #9 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Camofox Browser doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Skyvern 87.3

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Skyvern-AI/skyvern · #70 overall · #8 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+8.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 8%
+2.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 4.4
+0.6Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

13.4

Safety / IntegritySkyvern +8.3

21.7

12.2

TransparencySkyvern +2.6

14.8

19.4

MaintenanceSkyvern +0.6

20.0

15.1

AdoptionCamofox Browser +0.1

15.0

+2.4

Runtime calibrationCamofox Browser +4.6

-2.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Camofox Browser and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser	SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score	80.5	87.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#176	#70
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#9	#8
GitHub stars	12.2k	23.4k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.4 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	9k/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.4	21.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.2	14.8
Maintenance / 20	19.4	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.1	15.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	—	5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Camofox Browser profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →