Registry › Compare › Camofox Browser vs Peekaboo

Camofox Browser vs Peekaboo

Peekaboo leads on trust: 89.9/100 (Grade A) against 81.1/100 (Grade A), a 8.8-point gap. Camofox Browser leads on adoption; Peekaboo leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

jo-inc/camofox-browser · #133 overall · #8 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Camofox Browser if adoption matters most.

  • +2.2Adoption: 16.3k weekly downloads against 1.5k
A Peekaboo 89.9

Peekaboo is a macOS CLI & optional MCP server that enables AI agents to capture screenshots of applications, or the entire system, with optional visual question answering through local or remote AI models.

openclaw/Peekaboo · #21 overall · #3 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Peekaboo if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

  • +7.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 8%
  • +1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 4.9
  • +1.3Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 4d ago

Where they differ

14.0
Safety / IntegrityPeekaboo +7.0
21.0
12.7
TransparencyPeekaboo +1.6
14.3
18.6
MaintenancePeekaboo +1.3
19.9
15.4
AdoptionCamofox Browser +2.2
13.2
+2.4
Runtime calibrationPeekaboo +1.1
+3.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Camofox Browser and Peekaboo, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo
HVTrust score 81.1 89.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #133 #21
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #8 #3
GitHub stars 11.5k 5.3k
Last updated 4d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 6.8 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 16k/wk 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.0 21.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.7 14.3
Maintenance / 20 18.6 19.9
Adoption / 20 15.4 13.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers — —
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Camofox Browser profile Peekaboo profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →