RegistryCompare › CAMEL vs squad

CAMEL vs squad

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CAMEL and squad, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

CAMEL leads on trust — 64.9/100 (Grade C) vs 61.9/100 (Grade C), a 3.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CAMELcamel-ai/camel squadbradygaster/squad
HVTrust score 64.9 61.9
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #263 #326
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems #3 #8
GitHub stars 17.7k 3.1k
Last updated 3d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10 5.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 12k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.3 10.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.3 12.8
Maintenance / 20 13.8 20.0
Adoption / 20 15.6 8.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers 14 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → CAMEL profile squad profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →