RegistryCompare › Call Center AI vs LiveKit Agents

Call Center AI vs LiveKit Agents

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Call Center AI and LiveKit Agents, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LiveKit Agents leads on trust — 91.8/100 (Grade A) vs 45.2/100 (Grade D), a 46.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Call Center AImicrosoft/call-center-ai LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents
HVTrust score 45.2 91.8
Evidence grade D A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #356 #5
Rank in Voice & Conversational #7 #1
GitHub stars 6.6k 14.3k
Last updated 82d ago today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10 6.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 791k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 6.6 20.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.4 13.9
Maintenance / 20 6.5 20.0
Adoption / 20 9.2 17.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Redis 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Call Center AI profile LiveKit Agents profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →