RegistryCompare › Browser4 vs Cua

Browser4 vs Cua

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser4 and Cua, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser4 leads on trust — 76.1/100 (Grade B) vs 74.2/100 (Grade B), a 1.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser4platonai/Browser4 Cuatrycua/cua
HVTrust score 76.1 74.2
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #130 #145
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #5 #6
GitHub stars 1.1k 22.1k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10 4.9 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 987/wk 11k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.2 9.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.3 12.7
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 11.3 15.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser4 profile Cua profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →