RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Skyvern

Browser Harness vs Skyvern

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 88.4/100 (Grade A) vs 79.4/100 (Grade B), a 9.0-point gap. Note: Browser Harness's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score 88.4 79.4
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #16 #62
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #4
GitHub stars 16.5k 22.7k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 7.0 / 10
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Downloads 1.8M/wk 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.1 16.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 14.4
Maintenance / 20 18.7 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.4 14.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →