RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Peekaboo

Browser Harness vs Peekaboo

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Peekaboo, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 88.6/100 (Grade A) vs 74.7/100 (Grade B), a 13.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo
HVTrust score 88.6 74.7
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #24 #101
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #8
GitHub stars 17.2k 5.1k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 2.3M/wk 2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.6 11.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.7 13.8
Maintenance / 20 19.1 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.7 13.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Peekaboo profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →