Registry › Compare › Browser Harness vs Peekaboo

Browser Harness vs Peekaboo

Both are Grade A and 0.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Browser Harness leads on adoption; Peekaboo leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A Browser Harness 90.3

Browser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.

browser-use/browser-harness · #20 overall · #2 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Browser Harness if adoption matters most.

+5.3Adoption: 1.6M weekly downloads against 1.5k

A Peekaboo 90.0

Peekaboo is a macOS CLI & optional MCP server that enables AI agents to capture screenshots of applications, or the entire system, with optional visual question answering through local or remote AI models.

openclaw/Peekaboo · #21 overall · #3 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Peekaboo if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+4.5Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 31%
+0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 6.0

Where they differ

16.5

Safety / IntegrityPeekaboo +4.5

21.0

13.6

TransparencyPeekaboo +0.7

14.3

19.9

MaintenancePeekaboo +0.1

20.0

18.5

AdoptionBrowser Harness +5.3

13.2

+3.8

Runtime calibrationBrowser Harness +0.3

+3.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Peekaboo, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness	Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo
HVTrust score	90.3	90.0
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#20	#21
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#2	#3
GitHub stars	18.4k	5.3k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.0 / 10	6.8 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	1.6M/wk	1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	16.5	21.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.6	14.3
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	18.5	13.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Peekaboo profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →