RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs OpenCLI

Browser Harness vs OpenCLI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and OpenCLI, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 88.4/100 (Grade A) vs 63.6/100 (Grade C), a 24.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness OpenCLIjackwener/OpenCLI
HVTrust score 88.4 63.6
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #16 #174
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #8
GitHub stars 16.5k 27.7k
Last updated 1d ago 5d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 5.2 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 1.8M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.1 11.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.7 12.9
Maintenance / 20 18.7 18.3
Adoption / 20 18.4 10.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile OpenCLI profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →