RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Obscura

Browser Harness vs Obscura

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Obscura, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 90.9/100 (Grade A) vs 67.5/100 (Grade B), a 23.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Obscurah4ckf0r0day/obscura
HVTrust score 90.9 67.5
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #8 #236
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #8
GitHub stars 17.3k 24.1k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 1.1M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.3 10.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.9 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 18.2 10.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Obscura profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →