RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Camofox Browser

Browser Harness vs Camofox Browser

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Camofox Browser, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 87.8/100 (Grade A) vs 71.9/100 (Grade B), a 15.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser
HVTrust score 87.8 71.9
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #24 #115
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #8
GitHub stars 16.7k 8.5k
Last updated 9d ago 8d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 2.9M/wk 60k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.1 8.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 8.5
Maintenance / 20 17.6 18.8
Adoption / 20 18.7 15.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Camofox Browser profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →