Registry › Compare › Browser Harness vs Camofox Browser

Browser Harness vs Camofox Browser

Browser Harness leads on trust: 90.5/100 (Grade A) against 80.5/100 (Grade A), a 10.0-point gap. Browser Harness leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A Browser Harness 90.5

Let Claude Code, Codex or Cursor use your real Chrome, logged in as you. One prompt to set up. Open source, MIT.

browser-use/browser-harness · #24 overall · #5 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Browser Harness if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+3.8Safety / Integrity: 41% of recent commits signed, against 8%
+3.6Adoption: 2.2M weekly downloads against 9.3k
+1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.1 against 4.4

A Camofox Browser 80.5

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

jo-inc/camofox-browser · #176 overall · #9 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Camofox Browser doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

17.2

Safety / IntegrityBrowser Harness +3.8

13.4

13.7

TransparencyBrowser Harness +1.5

12.2

19.2

MaintenanceCamofox Browser +0.2

19.4

18.7

AdoptionBrowser Harness +3.6

15.1

+3.7

Runtime calibrationBrowser Harness +1.3

+2.4

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Camofox Browser, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness	Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser
HVTrust score	90.5	80.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#24	#176
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#5	#9
GitHub stars	19.0k	12.2k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.1 / 10	4.4 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	2.2M/wk	9k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.2	13.4
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.7	12.2
Maintenance / 20	19.2	19.4
Adoption / 20	18.7	15.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Camofox Browser profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →