RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Camofox Browser

Browser Harness vs Camofox Browser

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Camofox Browser, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 90.8/100 (Grade A) vs 80.4/100 (Grade A), a 10.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser
HVTrust score 90.8 80.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #8 #125
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #7
GitHub stars 17.4k 10.3k
Last updated 1d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 5.0 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 1.2M/wk 27k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.3 14.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.8 12.8
Maintenance / 20 19.9 17.0
Adoption / 20 18.3 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Camofox Browser profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →