RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Browser4

Browser Harness vs Browser4

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Browser4, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 88.6/100 (Grade A) vs 76.8/100 (Grade B), a 11.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Browser4platonai/Browser4
HVTrust score 88.6 76.8
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #23 #103
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #8
GitHub stars 17.2k 1.1k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 4.8 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.3M/wk 987/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.5 13.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 12.6
Maintenance / 20 19.3 19.9
Adoption / 20 18.6 11.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — Anthropic 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Browser4 profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →